Illinois · House Bill · 2025 Session
HB3178
Illinois HB 3178 — An Act concerning business (amending the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act, Section 10)

Status ● Enacted Effective Jan 1, 2026 Passage Likelihood N/A

How Is This Bill Enforced

Enforcement Authority
The bill amends Section 10 of the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550) to narrow the unenforceability provision for digital replica agreements. Enforcement mechanisms are governed by the underlying Act; no separate enforcement authority is created by this amendment.
Private Right of Action
No private right of action. Enforcement is exclusive to the designated authority.
Penalties
This amendment does not independently create remedies or penalties. Remedies and enforcement flow from the underlying Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550).

What This Bill Requires

Verbatim statutory text on the left; plain-language analysis and a per-section checklist on the right. Numbered markers cross-link to the matching checklist row.

Statutory Text
Analysis & Obligations
815 ILCS 550/10
Unenforceable agreements — digital replica provisions

(a) 1 A provision in an agreement between an individual and any other person for the performance of personal or professional services is unenforceable only as it relates to a new performance, fixed on or after January 1, 2026, by a digital replica of an individual if the provision meets all of the following conditions: (1) the provision allows for the creation and use of a digital replica of the individual's voice or likeness in place of work the individual would otherwise have performed in person; (2) the provision does not include a reasonably specific description of the intended uses of the digital replicadigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced); and (3) the individual was not either: (A) represented by legal counsel who negotiated on behalf of the individual licensing his or her digital replicadigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced) rights and the licensing terms governing the use of the applicable digital replicadigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced) exist in a written agreement; or (B) represented by a labor union representing workers who do the proposed work and the terms of the labor union's collective bargaining agreement expressly covers uses of digital replicasdigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced) as that term is defined in this Act or in the individual's collective bargaining agreement.

(b) The failure to include a reasonably specific description of the intended uses of a digital replicadigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced) as described in paragraph (2) of subsection (a) shall not render a provision in an agreement unenforceable when the uses of the digital replicadigital replicaAs defined in the Digital Voice and Likeness Protection Act (815 ILCS 550). The term is referenced throughout Section 10 but is defined elsewhere in the Act, not in this amendment.815 ILCS 550 (referenced) are consistent with the terms of the contract for the performance of personal or professional services and the fundamental character of the photography or sound track as recorded or performed.

(c) This Section does not affect any provision of a contract other than a provision described in subsection (a) and does not impact, abrogate, or otherwise affect any exclusivity grants contained in, or related to, a provision subject to subsection (a).

This section establishes when a contractual provision allowing the creation and use of a digital replica of an individual's voice or likeness in place of personal performance is unenforceable. The amendment narrows the original Act's broad unenforceability rule to apply only to new performances fixed on or after January 1, 2026. A provision is unenforceable only when all three conditions are met: the provision substitutes a digital replica for in-person work, lacks a reasonably specific description of intended uses, and the individual was not represented by counsel or a labor union whose collective bargaining agreement covers digital replicas.

The amendment adds two new subsections. Subsection (b) creates a safe harbor: even without a specific use description, a provision remains enforceable if the digital replica uses are consistent with the contract terms and the fundamental character of the original recording or performance. Subsection (c) is a savings clause clarifying that the unenforceability rule does not affect other contract provisions or related exclusivity grants.

Section 99
Effective date

This Act takes effect January 1, 2026.

This section establishes that the Act takes effect January 1, 2026.

Passage Likelihood

Enacted
Status Enacted

Legislative History

2025-02-06 Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz
2025-02-18 First Reading
2025-02-18 Referred to Rules Committee
2025-03-11 Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
2025-03-19 Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee; 020-000-000
2025-03-19 Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
2025-03-25 Second Reading - Short Debate
2025-03-25 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
2025-04-09 Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 114-000-000
2025-04-09 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Hoan Huynh
2025-04-10 Arrive in Senate
2025-04-10 Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
2025-04-10 Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Mary Edly-Allen
2025-04-10 First Reading
2025-04-10 Referred to Assignments
2025-04-23 Assigned to Judiciary
2025-05-01 Do Pass Judiciary; 007-000-000
2025-05-01 Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 6, 2025
2025-05-07 Second Reading
2025-05-07 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 8, 2025
2025-05-20 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading **
2025-05-22 Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
2025-05-22 Passed Both Houses
2025-06-20 Sent to the Governor
2025-08-15 Governor Approved
2025-08-15 Effective Date January 1, 2026
2025-08-15 Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0282

Entry Last Reviewed

2026-05-20
AI generated