SB-467
KS · State · USA
KS
USA
● Pending
Kansas SB 467 — Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Decisions Transparency Act
Applies to every health insurer and utilization review organization in Kansas that uses AI, algorithms, or other software tools for utilization review or utilization management functions based in whole or in part on medical necessity. Requires that such tools base determinations on individualized enrollee clinical data rather than solely on group datasets, prohibits AI tools from independently denying, delaying, or modifying healthcare services based on medical necessity, and mandates that all medical necessity determinations be made by a licensed physician or competent healthcare professional. Requires insurers to establish written policies and procedures for their utilization review processes, file those policies with the Kansas Department of Insurance, and disclose them to insureds, providers, and the public upon request. The bill does not create a private right of action or specify penalties.
Summary

Applies to every health insurer and utilization review organization in Kansas that uses AI, algorithms, or other software tools for utilization review or utilization management functions based in whole or in part on medical necessity. Requires that such tools base determinations on individualized enrollee clinical data rather than solely on group datasets, prohibits AI tools from independently denying, delaying, or modifying healthcare services based on medical necessity, and mandates that all medical necessity determinations be made by a licensed physician or competent healthcare professional. Requires insurers to establish written policies and procedures for their utilization review processes, file those policies with the Kansas Department of Insurance, and disclose them to insureds, providers, and the public upon request. The bill does not create a private right of action or specify penalties.

Enforcement & Penalties
Enforcement Authority
The Kansas Department of Insurance is the designated regulatory authority. Health insurers must file AI-related utilization review policies and procedures with the department. The statute does not create a private right of action or specify an independent enforcement mechanism beyond existing insurance regulatory authority.
Penalties
The statute does not specify monetary penalties, civil penalties, statutory damages, or any specific remedies. Enforcement would presumably proceed under existing Kansas insurance regulatory authority and remedies available to the Kansas Department of Insurance.
Who Is Covered
Compliance Obligations 5 obligations · click obligation ID to open requirement page
HC-01 Healthcare AI Decision Restrictions · HC-01.3HC-01.1 · Deployer · Healthcare
Section 1(c)(1)(A)-(B), (c)(2)
Plain Language
Health insurers and utilization review organizations must ensure that any AI, algorithm, or software tool used in utilization review bases its determinations on the enrollee's individual medical history, the requesting provider's clinical presentation, and other relevant clinical information from the enrollee's record — not solely on group-level datasets. Critically, the AI tool itself is categorically prohibited from denying, delaying, or modifying healthcare services based on medical necessity. All medical necessity determinations must be made by a licensed physician or competent licensed healthcare professional who reviews the provider's recommendation and the enrollee's individualized clinical circumstances.
Statutory Text
(1) Each health insurer and utilization review organization shall ensure that the artificial intelligence, algorithm or other software tool used to review and approve, modify and delay or deny requests by providers: (A) Makes a determination based on the following information, as applicable: (i) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history; (ii) individual clinical circumstances as presented by the requesting healthcare provider; and (iii) other relevant clinical information contained in the enrollee's medical or other clinical record; (B) does not make a determination based solely on a group dataset; (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), the artificial intelligence, algorithm or other software tool shall not deny, delay or modify healthcare services based in whole or in part on medical necessity. A determination of medical necessity shall be made only by a licensed physician or a licensed healthcare professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the healthcare services requested by the healthcare provider by reviewing and considering such healthcare provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
HC-01 Healthcare AI Decision Restrictions · HC-01.2 · Deployer · Healthcare
Section 1(d)
Plain Language
This is a standalone prohibition reinforcing that only a licensed physician or a competent licensed healthcare professional may deny or modify healthcare service authorization requests for medical necessity reasons. No other individual — and by extension no AI system — may make that determination. This operates as a parallel prohibition to Section 1(c)(2), applicable not just to AI tools but to any individual in the utilization review process.
Statutory Text
No individual, other than a licensed physician or a licensed healthcare professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the healthcare services requested by the provider, shall deny or modify requests for authorization of healthcare services for an enrollee for reasons of medical necessity.
HC-01 Healthcare AI Decision Restrictions · HC-01.4 · Deployer · Healthcare
Section 1(c)(1)(C)-(H)
Plain Language
Health insurers and utilization review organizations must ensure their AI tools do not supplant provider decision-making, do not discriminate against enrollees, are fairly and equitably applied consistent with HHS guidance, are periodically reviewed and revised for accuracy and reliability, comply with HIPAA for patient data use, and do not directly or indirectly cause harm to enrollees. These are ongoing operational requirements — particularly the periodic review obligation (F) — not one-time checks.
Statutory Text
Each health insurer and utilization review organization shall ensure that the artificial intelligence, algorithm or other software tool used to review and approve, modify and delay or deny requests by providers: (C) does not supplant healthcare provider decision-making; (D) does not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against enrollees in violation of state or federal law; (E) is fairly and equitably applied, in accordance with any applicable regulations or guidance issued by the United States department of health and human services; (F) is periodically reviewed and revised to maximize accuracy and reliability; (G) uses patient data in compliance with the health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, public law 104-191; and (H) does not directly or indirectly cause harm to the enrollee.
HC-01 Healthcare AI Decision Restrictions · HC-01.7 · Deployer · Healthcare
Section 1(e)(1)-(2)
Plain Language
Each health insurer must create and maintain written policies and procedures describing how it conducts prospective, retrospective, and concurrent utilization review based on medical necessity. These policies must require that medical necessity decisions are consistent with clinically supported criteria or guidelines. This is a documentation and governance obligation — the insurer must formalize its utilization review process in writing and ensure the written process mandates clinical standards compliance.
Statutory Text
(e) Each health insurer subject to this act shall establish written policies and procedures that: (1) Describe the process by which the health benefit plan prospectively, retrospectively or concurrently reviews and approves, modifies and delays or denies requests, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, by healthcare providers of healthcare services for health benefit plan enrollees; and (2) require decisions to be based on the medical necessity of proposed healthcare services are consistent with criteria or guidelines that are supported by clinical principles and processes.
HC-01 Healthcare AI Decision Restrictions · HC-01.7 · Deployer · Healthcare
Section 1(f)(1)-(3)
Plain Language
Each health insurer must file its AI-related utilization review policies and procedures with the Kansas Department of Insurance. The filed policies must ensure that medical necessity decisions are consistent with clinically supported criteria. Insurers must also make these policies available upon request to insureds, healthcare providers, and the general public. This creates both a regulatory filing obligation and a public transparency obligation — insurers cannot keep their AI utilization review processes confidential from affected parties.
Statutory Text
(f) (1) Each health insurer subject to this act shall file with the department such health insurer's policies and procedures establishing the process by which such health insurer prospectively, retrospectively or concurrently reviews and approves, modifies and delays or denies requests, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, by providers of healthcare services for health benefit plan enrollees. (2) Pursuant to paragraph (1), such policies and procedures shall ensure that healthcare decisions based on the medical necessity of proposed healthcare services are consistent with criteria or guidelines that are supported by clinical principles and processes. (3) Each health insurer shall disclose such policies and procedures to insureds, healthcare providers and the public upon request.