New Hampshire · Senate Bill · 2025 Session
SB263
New Hampshire SB 263 — An Act criminalizing and creating a private right of action for the facilitation, encouragement, offer, solicitation, or recommendation of certain acts or actions through a responsive generative communication to a child

Status ● Engrossed Effective Jan 1, 2026 Passage Likelihood H

WHAT THIS BILL REGULATES · 1 REQUIREMENT TYPE

How Is This Bill Enforced

Enforcement Authority
Criminal prosecution under RSA 639:3 (endangering welfare of a child). Private right of action available to a child, parent of a child, or next friend of a child who was the target of a covered communication. Standing requires that the communication was directed to the child with intent to facilitate or solicit the child to imminently engage in enumerated harmful acts.
Private Right of Action
Private right of action available to a child, parent of a child, or next friend of a child who was the target of a covered communication.
Penalties
Proximate damages plus liquidated damages of no less than $1,000 per violation. Attorney's fees recoverable by prevailing plaintiff. No cap on actual damages.

What This Bill Requires

Verbatim statutory text on the left; plain-language analysis and a per-section checklist on the right. Numbered markers cross-link to the matching checklist row.

Statutory Text
Analysis & Obligations
RSA 639:3, III-a
Endangering Welfare of a Child — Responsive Generative Communication
Deployer

III-a(a) 1 In the prosecution of any person under this section, an owner or operator of a computer online service, internet service, or bulletin board service, including a provider of an artificial intelligence (AI) chat program, large language model artificial intelligence bot, chat bot, character AI, or other computer application whose sole purpose is to provide responsive open-ended generative communication through the use of artificial intelligence, constitutes endangering the welfare of a childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3 if the communication is made with the intent to facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3 imminently engage in: (1) Sexually explicit conductSexually explicit conductThe bill references 'sexually explicit conduct' without independent definition. The term is used in RSA 639:3 and RSA 507:8-k to describe one of the enumerated categories of harmful acts that may not be facilitated, encouraged, offered, solicited, or recommended to a child through responsive generative communication.RSA 639:3, III-a(a)(1); RSA 507:8-k, I(1). (2) The production or participation in the production of a visual depiction of such conduct. (3) The illegal use or drugs or alcohol. (4) Acts of self-harm or suicide. (5) Any crime of violence against another person.

III-a(b) This paragraph shall not apply to: (1) A provider of a telecommunications service or an information service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. section 153, for the provision of content created by or supplied on behalf of another person; or (2) Any product, service, website, or application that provides an AI chat program or character that is integral or incidental to a video game, television, streaming, movie, or other similar interactive experience.

This section amends the existing child-endangerment statute (RSA 639:3) by adding a new paragraph that extends criminal liability to owners and operators of AI chatbot services whose responsive generative communications facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that a child imminently engage in specified harmful acts. The covered harmful acts are sexually explicit conduct, production of visual depictions of such conduct, illegal drug or alcohol use, self-harm or suicide, and violence against another person.

The provision requires intent — the communication must be made with the intent to facilitate or solicit the child's imminent engagement in an enumerated act. Two categories of services are exempt: telecommunications and information service providers (as defined under 47 U.S.C. § 153) acting as conduits for third-party content, and AI chat features that are integral or incidental to video games, streaming, or similar interactive entertainment experiences.

Compliance actions 1 item
1
Owners and operators of AI chatbot services must not generate responsive communications that facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that a childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3 imminently engage in sexually explicit conductSexually explicit conductThe bill references 'sexually explicit conduct' without independent definition. The term is used in RSA 639:3 and RSA 507:8-k to describe one of the enumerated categories of harmful acts that may not be facilitated, encouraged, offered, solicited, or recommended to a child through responsive generative communication.RSA 639:3, III-a(a)(1); RSA 507:8-k, I(1), production of visual depictions of such conduct, illegal drug or alcohol use, self-harm or suicide, or violence against another person. Violation constitutes criminal endangering of the welfare of a childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3. Exempt: telecommunications/information service providers for third-party content, and AI features incidental to video games, streaming, or similar entertainment.
S-02.6
RSA 507:8-k
Private Right of Action — Solicitation of Children Through Responsive Generative Communication
Deployer

I 2 Any owner or operator of a computer online service, internet service, or bulletin board service, including a provider of an artificial intelligence (AI) chat program, large language model artificial intelligence bot, chat bot, character AI, or other computer application whose sole purpose is to provide responsive open-ended generative communication through the use of artificial intelligence, shall be liable to a childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3, parent of such childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3, or next friend of such childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3, for any communication made with the intent to facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3 imminently engage in: (1) Sexually explicit conductSexually explicit conductThe bill references 'sexually explicit conduct' without independent definition. The term is used in RSA 639:3 and RSA 507:8-k to describe one of the enumerated categories of harmful acts that may not be facilitated, encouraged, offered, solicited, or recommended to a child through responsive generative communication.RSA 639:3, III-a(a)(1); RSA 507:8-k, I(1). (2) The production or participation in the production of a visual depiction of such conduct. (3) The illegal use or drugs or alcohol. (4) Acts of self-harm or suicide. (5) Any crime of violence against another person.

II 2 The owner or operator of such service shall be liable to the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3, the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3's parent, or the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3's next friend for damages proximately caused thereby, but in no instance liable for an amount less than liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000 per violation.

III 2 In addition to any damages set forth in this section, the owner or operator of a computer service described in this chapter shall be liable for the attorney's fees of any plaintiff prevailing in an action brought pursuant to this section.

IV This section shall not apply to: (1) A provider of a telecommunications service or an information service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. section 153, for the provision of content created by or supplied on behalf of another person; or (2) Any product, service, website, or application that provides an AI chat program or character that is integral or incidental to a video game, television, streaming, movie, or other similar interactive experience.

This section creates a new civil cause of action (RSA 507:8-k) that mirrors the criminal prohibition in Section 1 but provides a private enforcement mechanism. Any child, parent, or next friend of a child may sue the owner or operator of a covered AI chatbot service for damages proximately caused by a communication made with intent to facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that the child imminently engage in the same five categories of harmful conduct.

The damages provision establishes a floor of $1,000 per violation in liquidated damages even absent proof of higher actual damages. Prevailing plaintiffs recover attorney's fees. The same two exemptions from the criminal provision apply: telecommunications/information service providers for third-party content, and AI chat features incidental to entertainment products.

Compliance actions 1 item
2
Owners and operators of AI chatbot services are civilly liable to a childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3, the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3's parent, or next friend for any responsive generative communication made with intent to facilitate, encourage, offer, solicit, or recommend that the childChildThe bill does not independently define 'child.' Under RSA 639:3, the term refers to a person under the age of 18.RSA 639:3 imminently engage in sexually explicit conductSexually explicit conductThe bill references 'sexually explicit conduct' without independent definition. The term is used in RSA 639:3 and RSA 507:8-k to describe one of the enumerated categories of harmful acts that may not be facilitated, encouraged, offered, solicited, or recommended to a child through responsive generative communication.RSA 639:3, III-a(a)(1); RSA 507:8-k, I(1), production of visual depictions of such conduct, illegal drug or alcohol use, self-harm or suicide, or violence against another person. Damages include proximate damages with a floor of $1,000 per violation plus attorney's fees. Exempt: telecommunications/information service providers for third-party content, and AI features incidental to video games, streaming, or similar entertainment.
S-02.6
Section 3
Effective Date

This act shall take effect January 1, 2026.

The act takes effect January 1, 2026.

Passage Likelihood

High
Status Engrossed
Chamber Passed origin
Committee No action
Majority party Yes
Bipartisan No
Prior session None

Legislative History

2025-01-23 Introduced 01/09/2025 and Referred to Judiciary; Senate Journal 3
2025-02-26 Hearing: 03/04/2025, Room 100, State House, 01:40 pm; Senate Calendar 11
2025-03-07 Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2025-0745s, 03/13/2025; Vote 4-0; Consent Calendar; Senate Calendar 12
2025-03-13 SB 263 was Removed from the Consent Calendar; 03/13/2025; Senate Journal 7
2025-03-13 Special Order to 03/20/2025, Without Objection, Motion Adopted; 03/13/2025 Senate Journal 7
2025-03-13 Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2025-0745s, 03/20/2025, Vote 4-0; Senate Calendar 13
2025-03-20 Committee Amendment # 2025-0745s, Amendment Adopted, Voice Vote; 03/20/2025; Senate Journal 8
2025-03-20 Ought to Pass with Amendment #2025-0745s, Motion Adopted, Voice Vote; OT3rdg; 03/20/2025; Senate Journal 8
2025-03-28 Introduced (in recess of) 03/27/2025 and referred to Judiciary House Journal 11 P. 113
2025-04-03 Public Hearing: 04/09/2025 02:00 pm Legislative Office Building 206-208
2025-04-16 Executive Session: 04/23/2025 10:00 am Legislative Office Building 206-208
2025-04-30 Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2025-1717h 04/23/2025 (Vote 17-1; Consent Calendar) House Calendar 23 P. 9
2025-05-08 Amendment # 2025-1717h: Amendment Adopted Voice Vote 05/08/2025 House Journal 14 P. 11
2025-05-08 Ought to Pass with Amendment 2025-1717h: Motion Adopted Voice Vote 05/08/2025 House Journal 14 P. 12
2025-05-08 Referred to Criminal Justice and Public Safety 05/08/2025 House Journal 14 P. 12
2025-05-14 Public Hearing: 05/23/2025 10:30 am Legislative Office Building 202-204
2025-05-14 Executive Session: 05/23/2025 01:00 pm Legislative Office Building 202-204
2025-05-28 Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass 05/23/2025 (Vote 12-4; Regular Calendar) House Calendar 27 P. 15
2025-05-28 Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
2025-06-05 Lay SB263 on Table (Rep. Cormen): Motion Failed Regular Calendar 179-193 06/05/2025 House Journal 16 P. 66
2025-06-05 FLAM # 2025-2567h (NT) (Rep. Lynn): Amendment Adopted DV 208-162 06/05/2025 House Journal 16 P. 68
2025-06-05 FLAM # 2025-2639h (Rep. Cormen): Amendment Failed DV 171-198 06/05/2025 House Journal 16 P. 68
2025-06-05 Ought to Pass with Amendment 2025-2567h: Motion Adopted Regular Calendar 202-168 06/05/2025 House Journal 16 P. 69
2025-06-12 Sen. Gannon Moved Nonconcur with the House Amendment, Motion Adopted, Voice Vote; 06/12/2025; Senate Journal 16

Entry Last Reviewed

2026-05-20
AI generated