Texas · Senate Bill · 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session
SB815
Texas SB 815 — Relating to the use of certain automated systems in, and certain adverse determinations made in connection with, the health benefit claims process

Status ● Enacted Effective Sep 1, 2025 Passage Likelihood N/A

WHAT THIS BILL REGULATES · 2 REQUIREMENT TYPES

How Is This Bill Enforced

Enforcement Authority
The Texas Commissioner of Insurance has authority to audit and inspect a utilization review agent's use of automated decision systems at any time. Enforcement is agency-initiated through the Texas Department of Insurance. No private right of action is created by this bill.
Private Right of Action
No private right of action. Enforcement is exclusive to the designated authority.
Penalties
The bill does not specify monetary penalties, damages, or remedies. Enforcement is through the Texas Department of Insurance's existing regulatory authority over utilization review agents under Chapter 4201 of the Insurance Code, which includes the power to impose administrative sanctions and revoke certifications.

What This Bill Requires

Verbatim statutory text on the left; plain-language analysis and a per-section checklist on the right. Numbered markers cross-link to the matching checklist row.

Statutory Text
Analysis & Obligations
Ins. Code § 4201.002
Definitions: adverse determination, algorithm, AI system, automated decision system

(1) "Adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1)" means a determination by a utilization review agentUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002 that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.

(1-a) "AlgorithmAlgorithm"Algorithm" means a computerized procedure consisting of a set of steps used to accomplish a determined task.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-a)" means a computerized procedure consisting of a set of steps used to accomplish a determined task.

(1-b) "Artificial intelligence systemArtificial intelligence system"Artificial intelligence system" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs the system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-b)" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs the system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.

(1-c) "Automated decision systemAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c)" means an algorithmAlgorithm"Algorithm" means a computerized procedure consisting of a set of steps used to accomplish a determined task.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-a), including an algorithmAlgorithm"Algorithm" means a computerized procedure consisting of a set of steps used to accomplish a determined task.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-a) incorporating an artificial intelligence systemArtificial intelligence system"Artificial intelligence system" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs the system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-b), that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.

Section 1 of the Act amends the definitions section of Chapter 4201 of the Insurance Code. It broadens the existing definition of adverse determination to include determinations that services are not "appropriate" — previously the trigger was limited to "not medically necessary" or "experimental or investigational." It also adds three new defined terms: algorithm, artificial intelligence system, and automated decision system. The automated decision system definition is particularly broad, encompassing any algorithm that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend determinations, and explicitly includes algorithms that incorporate AI. These definitions set the scope for the operative prohibition in new Section 4201.156.

Ins. Code § 4201.156
Prohibition on automated decision systems for adverse determinations
Deployer

(a) 1 A utilization review agentUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002 may not use an automated decision systemAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) to make, wholly or partly, an adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1).

(b) 2 The commissioner may audit and inspect at any time a utilization review agentUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002's use of an automated decision systemAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) for utilization review.

(c) This section does not prohibit the use of an algorithmAlgorithm"Algorithm" means a computerized procedure consisting of a set of steps used to accomplish a determined task.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-a), artificial intelligence systemArtificial intelligence system"Artificial intelligence system" means any machine learning-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs the system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, and recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-b), or automated decision systemAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) for administrative support or fraud-detection functions.

New Section 4201.156 is the operative heart of the bill. Subsection (a) flatly prohibits utilization review agents from using an automated decision system to make an adverse determination, whether wholly or partly. This goes further than many state AI-in-healthcare laws, which require human review of AI-informed denials but do not categorically bar AI from participating in the decision at all. The "wholly or partly" language forecloses the argument that AI may contribute to a denial so long as a human signs off.

Subsection (b) grants the Commissioner of Insurance standing authority to audit and inspect any utilization review agent's use of automated decision systems for utilization review at any time — a regulatory inspection power not limited to adverse determinations. Subsection (c) carves out administrative support and fraud-detection functions from the prohibition, preserving routine operational uses of AI and algorithms in those contexts.

Compliance actions 2 items
1
Utilization review agentsUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002 must not use an automated decision systemAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) to make, wholly or partly, any adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1) regarding medical necessity, appropriateness, or experimental/investigational status of health care services. Automated decision systemsAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) remain permitted for administrative support and fraud-detection functions.
HC-01.1
2
Utilization review agentsUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002 must make their automated decision systemsAutomated decision system"Automated decision system" means an algorithm, including an algorithm incorporating an artificial intelligence system, that uses data-based analytics to make, suggest, or recommend certain determinations, decisions, judgments, or conclusions.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1-c) used for utilization review available for audit and inspection by the Commissioner of Insurance at any time.
R-02.2
Ins. Code § 4201.303(a)
Enhanced adverse determination notice requirements
Deployer

(a) 3 Notice of an adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1) must include: (1) the principal reasons for the adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1); (2) the clinical basis for the adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1); (3) a description of and the source of the screening criteria and review procedures used as guidelines in making the adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1); and (4) a description of the procedure for the complaint and appeal process, including notice to the enrollee of the enrollee's right to appeal an adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1) to an independent review organization and of the procedures to obtain that review.

Section 3 of the Act amends existing adverse determination notice requirements in Section 4201.303(a) by strengthening the disclosure that must accompany each adverse determination. The prior law required either a description or the source of screening criteria; the amendment requires both a description and the source. It also adds a new requirement to disclose the review procedures used as guidelines in making the adverse determination, in addition to the screening criteria already required. These changes ensure that patients and providers receive a more complete picture of how the adverse determination was reached.

Compliance actions 1 item
3
Utilization review agentsUtilization review agentAs defined in existing Chapter 4201, Insurance Code — the entity conducting utilization review on behalf of a health benefit plan. The bill imposes obligations on utilization review agents regarding use of automated decision systems.Ins. Code § 4201.002 must include in every adverse determinationAdverse determination"Adverse determination" means a determination by a utilization review agent that health care services provided or proposed to be provided to a patient are not medically necessary or appropriate or are experimental or investigational.Ins. Code § 4201.002(1) notice: (1) the principal reasons for the determination, (2) the clinical basis, (3) a description of and the source of the screening criteria and review procedures used, and (4) a description of the complaint and appeal process including the enrollee's right to appeal to an independent review organization.
HC-01.6
Act § 4 (Applicability)
Applicability to health benefit plans

Chapter 4201, Insurance Code, as amended by this Act, applies only to utilization review conducted for a health benefit plan delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026. Utilization review conducted for a health benefit plan delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed before January 1, 2026, is governed by the law as it existed immediately before the effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose.

Section 4 limits the applicability of the Act's amendments to utilization review conducted for health benefit plans delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026. Plans delivered or renewed before that date remain governed by prior law. This creates a rolling implementation window — the prohibition on automated decision systems in adverse determinations will not apply universally until all pre-2026 plans have expired or renewed.

Act § 5 (Effective Date)
Effective date

This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.

The Act takes effect September 1, 2025. However, the operative provisions apply only to health benefit plans delivered, issued, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, per Section 4.

Passage Likelihood

Enacted
Status Enacted

Legislative History

2025-01-16 Received by the Secretary of the Senate
2025-01-16 Filed
2025-02-07 Read first time
2025-02-07 Referred to Business & Commerce
2025-02-27 Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-02-27 Considered in public hearing
2025-02-27 Testimony taken in committee
2025-02-27 Left pending in committee
2025-03-06 Co-author authorized
2025-03-11 Considered in public hearing
2025-03-11 Vote taken in committee
2025-03-13 Reported favorably as substituted
2025-03-13 Committee report printed and distributed
2025-03-18 Placed on intent calendar
2025-03-20 Not again placed on intent calendar
2025-03-25 Placed on intent calendar
2025-03-26 Co-author authorized
2025-03-26 Rules suspended-Regular order of business
2025-03-26 Record vote
2025-03-26 Read 2nd time
2025-03-26 Amendment(s) offered FA1 Schwertner
2025-03-26 Amended
2025-03-26 Vote recorded in Journal
2025-03-26 Passed to engrossment as amended
2025-03-26 Three day rule suspended
2025-03-26 Read 3rd time
2025-03-26 Passed
2025-03-26 Reported engrossed
2025-03-27 Received from the Senate
2025-04-09 Read first time
2025-04-09 Referred to Insurance
2025-04-23 Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-04-23 Considered in public hearing
2025-04-23 Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
2025-04-23 Left pending in committee
2025-04-28 Considered in formal meeting
2025-04-28 Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
2025-05-02 Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
2025-05-02 Committee report distributed
2025-05-05 Committee report sent to Calendars
2025-05-20 Considered in Calendars
2025-05-23 Placed on General State Calendar
2025-05-23 Read 2nd time
2025-05-23 Passed to 3rd reading
2025-05-23 Record vote RV#3418
2025-05-23 Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-24 Rules suspended
2025-05-24 Additional sponsor(s) authorized
2025-05-24 Read 3rd time
2025-05-24 Passed
2025-05-24 Record vote RV#3465
2025-05-24 Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-25 House passage reported
2025-05-26 Reported enrolled
2025-05-26 Signed in the Senate
2025-05-27 Signed in the House
2025-05-27 Sent to the Governor
2025-06-20 Signed by the Governor
2025-06-20 Effective on 9/1/25

Entry Last Reviewed

2026-05-10
AI generated