Regulon — CT-SB-2 · CT SB 2 (Artificial Intelligence)

WHAT THIS BILL REGULATES · 11 REQUIREMENT TYPES

How Is This Bill Enforced

Enforcement Authority

Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority. No private right of action. During the first year (Oct 1, 2026 – Sept 30, 2027), the AG must issue a notice of violation and allow 60 days to cure before initiating action. Beginning Oct 1, 2027, cure opportunity is discretionary. An affirmative defense is available for violations discovered through red-teaming, cured within 60 days, and where the entity is otherwise compliant with NIST AI RMF or equivalent frameworks. Violations constitute unfair trade practices under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110b, enforceable solely by the AG; § 42-110g (private enforcement) does not apply.

Private Right of Action

No private right of action. Enforcement is exclusive to the designated authority.

Penalties

Violations are enforceable as unfair trade practices under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110b, which authorizes the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief, civil penalties, restitution, and other equitable remedies. The private enforcement provisions of § 42-110g are expressly excluded. No specific statutory minimum or maximum is stated in the bill itself; penalty amounts are governed by the general CUTPA enforcement framework.

Verbatim statutory text on the left; plain-language analysis and a per-section checklist on the right. Numbered markers cross-link to the matching checklist row.

Statutory Text

Analysis & Obligations

Section 1

Definitions

(1)–(16) For the purposes of this section and sections 2 to 10, inclusive, of this act, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Algorithmic discrimination" ... (2) "Artificial intelligence system" ... (3) "Consequential decision" ... (4) "Consumer" ... (5) "Deploy" ... (6) "Deployer" ... (7) "Developer" ... (8) "General-purpose artificial intelligence model" ... (9) "High-risk artificial intelligence system" ... (10) "Integrator" ... (11) "Intentional and substantial modification" ... (12) "Person" ... (13) "Red-teaming" ... (14) "Substantial factor" ... (15) "Synthetic digital content" ... (16) "Trade secret" has the same meaning as provided in section 35-51 of the general statutes.

Section 1 establishes the defined terms used throughout sections 1–10 of the act. Key definitions include high-risk artificial intelligence system (an AI system that makes or is a substantial factor in making a consequential decision), consequential decision (covering employment, education, credit, housing, insurance, legal services, government services, and health care), and the three regulated party types: developer, deployer, and integrator. The high-risk AI definition contains broad carve-outs for narrow procedural tasks, anti-fraud tools without facial recognition, video games, utility software, internal management tools, and chatbots subject to acceptable-use policies.

Section 2

Developer obligations for high-risk AI systems

Developer

(a) 1 Beginning on October 1, 2026, a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended and contracted uses of the high-risk artificial intelligence system. In any enforcement action brought on or after said date by the Attorney General pursuant to section 10 of this act, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a developer used reasonable care as required under this subsection if the developer complied with the provisions of this section or, if the developer enters into a contract with an integrator as set forth in subsection (b) of section 3 of this act, the developer and integrator complied with the provisions of this section and section 3 of this act.

(b)(1)–(4) 2 Except as provided in subsection (c) of section 3 of this act, a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall, beginning on October 1, 2026, make available to each deployer, or other developer, of the high-risk artificial intelligence system: (1) A general statement describing the reasonably foreseeable uses, and the known harmful or inappropriate uses, of such high-risk artificial intelligence system; (2) Documentation disclosing (A) high-level summaries of the type of data used to train such high-risk artificial intelligence system, (B) the known or reasonably foreseeable limitations of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, including, but not limited to, the known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended uses of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, (C) the purpose of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, (D) the intended benefits and uses of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, and (E) all other information necessary to enable such deployer to comply with the provisions of section 4 of this act; (3) Documentation describing (A) how such high-risk artificial intelligence system was evaluated for performance, and mitigation of algorithmic discrimination, before such high-risk artificial intelligence system was offered, sold, leased, licensed, given or otherwise made available to such deployer, (B) the data governance measures used to cover the training datasets and the measures used to examine the suitability of data sources, possible biases and appropriate mitigation, (C) the intended outputs of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, (D) the measures the developer has taken to mitigate any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from deployment of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, and (E) how such high-risk artificial intelligence system should be used, not be used and be monitored by an individual when such high-risk artificial intelligence system is used to make, or as a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision; and (4) Any additional documentation that is reasonably necessary to assist a deployer to (A) understand the outputs of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, and (B) monitor the performance of such high-risk artificial intelligence system for risks of algorithmic discrimination.

(c) 2 Except as provided in subsection (c) of section 3 of this act, any developer that, on or after October 1, 2026, offers, sells, leases, licenses, gives or otherwise makes available to a deployer or another developer a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall, to the extent feasible, make available to the deployers and other developers of such high-risk artificial intelligence system the documentation and information necessary for a deployer, or the third party contracted by a deployer, to complete an impact assessment pursuant to subsection (c) of section 4 of this act. The developer shall make such documentation and information available through artifacts such as model cards, dataset cards or other impact assessments. (2) A developer that also serves as a deployer for any high-risk artificial intelligence system shall not be required to generate the documentation required by this section unless such high-risk artificial intelligence system is provided to another person that serves as a deployer for such high-risk artificial intelligence system.

(d) 3 Beginning on October 1, 2026, each developer shall make available, in a manner that is clear and readily available on such developer's Internet web site or in a public use case inventory, a statement summarizing: (A) The types of high-risk artificial intelligence systems that such developer (i) has developed or intentionally and substantially modified, and (ii) currently makes available to a deployer or another developer; and (B) How such developer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from development or intentional and substantial modification of the types of high-risk artificial intelligence systems described in subparagraph (A) of this subdivision. (2) Each developer shall update the statement made available pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection (A) as necessary to ensure that such statement remains accurate, and (B) not later than ninety days after the developer intentionally and substantially modifies any high-risk artificial intelligence system described in subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of this subsection.

(e) 4 Beginning on October 1, 2026, a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall disclose to the Attorney General, in a form and manner prescribed by the Attorney General, and to all known deployers or other developers of the high-risk artificial intelligence system, any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended uses of such high-risk artificial intelligence system. The developer shall make such disclosures without unreasonable delay but in no event later than ninety days after the date on which: (1) The developer discovers, through the developer's ongoing testing and analysis, that the high-risk artificial intelligence system has (A) been deployed, and (B) caused, or is reasonably likely to have caused, algorithmic discrimination to at least one thousand consumers; or (2) The developer receives, from a deployer of the high-risk artificial intelligence system, a credible report disclosing that such high-risk artificial intelligence system has (A) been deployed, and (B) caused algorithmic discrimination to at least one thousand consumers.

(f)–(g) 5 The provisions of subsections (b) to (e), inclusive, of this section shall not be construed to require a developer to disclose any information (1) that is a trade secret or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal law, or (2) the disclosure of which would present a security risk to the developer. (g) Beginning on October 1, 2026, the Attorney General may require that a developer disclose to the Attorney General, as part of an investigation conducted by the Attorney General and in a form and manner prescribed by the Attorney General, the general statement or documentation described in subsection (b) of this section. The Attorney General may evaluate such general statement or documentation to ensure compliance with the provisions of this section. In disclosing such general statement or documentation to the Attorney General pursuant to this subsection, the developer may designate such general statement or documentation as including any information that is exempt from disclosure under subsection (f) of this section or the Freedom of Information Act, as defined in section 1-200 of the general statutes. To the extent such general statement or documentation includes such information, such general statement or documentation shall be exempt from disclosure under subsection (f) of this section or said act. To the extent any information contained in such general statement or documentation is subject to the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, such disclosure shall not constitute a waiver of such privilege or protection.

Section 2 imposes the primary developer-side obligations. Developers of high-risk AI systems must exercise reasonable care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination, with a rebuttable presumption of compliance available for developers that meet the section's requirements. Developers must provide deployers with detailed documentation covering foreseeable uses, training data summaries, discrimination risks, performance evaluation methods, data governance measures, and monitoring guidance. Developers must also publish and maintain a public use-case statement describing their high-risk AI systems and discrimination risk management. A disclosure obligation to the Attorney General and all known deployers is triggered when algorithmic discrimination affecting at least 1,000 consumers is discovered or credibly reported. Trade secret and security risk information is protected from mandatory disclosure.

Compliance actions 5 items

Developers of high-risk AI systems must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from intended and contracted uses of the system.

H-02.1

Developers must make available to each deployer documentation covering foreseeable uses, training data summaries, discrimination risks, performance evaluation methods, data governance measures, intended outputs, mitigation measures, and monitoring guidance for each high-risk AI system, including materials necessary for the deployer to complete an impact assessment.

G-02.1

Developers must publish and maintain on their website or in a public use-case inventory a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they offer and how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, updated within 90 days of any intentional and substantial modification.

G-02.4

Developers must disclose to the Attorney General and all known deployers any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination within 90 days of discovering (through testing or a credible deployer report) that the system has caused or is reasonably likely to have caused algorithmic discrimination to at least 1,000 consumers.

R-01.3

Developers must, upon request by the Attorney General as part of an investigation, disclose the documentation described in section 2(b) in a form and manner the AG prescribes. Developers may designate trade-secret or security-sensitive information as exempt from public disclosure.

R-02.2

Section 3

Integrator obligations for high-risk AI systems

Deployer

(a) 6 Beginning on October 1, 2026, if an integrator integrates a high-risk artificial intelligence system into a product or service the integrator offers to any other person, such integrator shall use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended and contracted uses of such integrated high-risk artificial intelligence system. In any enforcement action brought on or after said date by the Attorney General pursuant to section 10 of this act, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the integrator used reasonable care as required under this subsection if the integrator complied with the provisions of this section.

(b) 7 Beginning on October 1, 2026, no integrator shall integrate a high-risk artificial intelligence system into a product or service the integrator offers to any other person unless the integrator has entered into a contract with the developer of the high-risk artificial intelligence system. The contract shall be binding and clearly set forth the duties of the developer and integrator with respect to the integrated high-risk artificial intelligence system, including, but not limited to, whether the developer or integrator shall be responsible for performing the developer's duties under subsections (b) and (c) of section 2 of this act.

(d) 8 Beginning on October 1, 2026, each integrator shall make available, in a manner that is clear and readily available on such integrator's Internet web site or in a public use case inventory, a statement summarizing: (A) The types of high-risk artificial intelligence systems that such integrator has integrated into products or services such integrator currently offers to any other person; and (B) How such integrator manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from the types of high-risk artificial intelligence systems described in subparagraph (A) of this subdivision. (2) Each integrator shall update the statement made available pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection (A) as necessary to ensure that such statement remains accurate, and (B) not later than ninety days after any intentional and substantial modification is made to any high-risk artificial intelligence system described in subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of this subsection.

Section 3 creates a new regulated party type — the integrator — for entities that embed a high-risk AI system developed by another party into their own product or service. Integrators must exercise reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination and must enter into a contract with the developer that allocates the developer's documentation and impact-assessment duties. Integrators must also publish and maintain a public use-case statement analogous to the developer's obligation in section 2(d). Where the integrator contractually assumes the developer's duties under section 2(b) and (c), the developer is relieved of those duties.

Compliance actions 3 items

Integrators must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended and contracted uses of any high-risk AI system they integrate into a product or service.

H-02.1

Integrators must enter into a binding contract with the developer of each high-risk AI system they integrate, clearly allocating the developer's documentation and impact-assessment duties between the developer and integrator.

H-02

Integrators must publish and maintain on their website or in a public use-case inventory a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they have integrated and how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, updated within 90 days of any intentional and substantial modification.

G-02.4

Section 4

Deployer obligations for high-risk AI systems

Deployer

(a) 9 Beginning on October 1, 2026, each deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination. In any enforcement action brought on or after said date by the Attorney General pursuant to section 10 of this act, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system used reasonable care as required under this subsection if the deployer complied with the provisions of this section.

(b) 10 Beginning on October 1, 2026, and except as provided in subsection (g) of this section, each deployer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system shall implement and maintain a risk management policy and program to govern such deployer's deployment of the high-risk artificial intelligence system. The risk management policy and program shall specify and incorporate the principles, processes and personnel that the deployer shall use to identify, document and mitigate any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination. The risk management policy shall be the product of an iterative process, the risk management program shall be an iterative process and both the risk management policy and program shall be planned, implemented and regularly and systematically reviewed and updated over the lifecycle of the high-risk artificial intelligence system. Each risk management policy and program implemented and maintained pursuant to this subsection shall be reasonable, considering: (A) The guidance and standards set forth in the latest version of (i) the "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework" published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, (ii) ISO or IEC 42001 of the International Organization for Standardization, or (iii) a nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems ... (B) The size and complexity of the deployer; (C) The nature and scope of the high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the deployer ... (D) The sensitivity and volume of data processed in connection with the high-risk artificial intelligence systems deployed by the deployer.

(c) 11 Except as provided in subdivisions (3) and (4) of this subsection and subsection (g) of this section: (A) A deployer that deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system on or after October 1, 2026, or a third party contracted by the deployer, shall complete an impact assessment of the high-risk artificial intelligence system; and (B) Beginning on October 1, 2026, a deployer, or a third party contracted by the deployer, shall complete an impact assessment of a deployed high-risk artificial intelligence system (i) at least annually, and (ii) not later than ninety days after an intentional and substantial modification to such high-risk artificial intelligence system is made available. (2)(A) Each impact assessment completed pursuant to this subsection shall include, at a minimum ... (i) A statement ... disclosing the purpose, intended use cases and deployment context ... (ii) An analysis of whether the deployment ... poses any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination ... (iii) A description of ... the categories of data the high-risk artificial intelligence system processes as inputs, and ... the outputs ... (iv) If the deployer used data to customize ... an overview of the categories of data ... (v) Any metrics used to evaluate the performance and known limitations ... (vi) A description of any transparency measures ... (vii) A description of the post-deployment monitoring and user safeguards ... (5) A deployer shall maintain the most recently completed impact assessment ... for a period of at least three years following the final deployment ...

(d) 12 Except as provided in subsection (g) of this section, a deployer, or a third party contracted by the deployer, shall review, not later than October 1, 2026, and at least annually thereafter, the deployment of each high-risk artificial intelligence system deployed by the deployer to ensure that such high-risk artificial intelligence system is not causing algorithmic discrimination.

(e)(1)–(3) 13 Beginning on October 1, 2026, and before a deployer deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system to make, or be a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision concerning a consumer, the deployer shall: (A) Notify the consumer that the deployer has deployed a high-risk artificial intelligence system to make, or be a substantial factor in making, such consequential decision; and (B) Provide to the consumer (i) a statement disclosing (I) the purpose of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, and (II) the nature of such consequential decision, (ii) the right to opt-out of any automated decision-making based on the consumer's personal data, (iii) contact information for such deployer, (iv) a description, in plain language, of such high-risk artificial intelligence system, and (v) instructions on how to access the statement made available pursuant to subdivision (1) of subsection (f) of this section. (2) Beginning on October 1, 2026, a deployer that has deployed a high-risk artificial intelligence system to make, or as a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision concerning a consumer shall, if such consequential decision is adverse to the consumer, provide to such consumer: (A) A statement disclosing the principal reason or reasons for such adverse consequential decision, including ... the degree to which, and manner in which, the high-risk artificial intelligence system contributed ... the type of data ... and ... the source of the data ... (B) An opportunity to (i) examine the personal data that the high-risk artificial intelligence system processed ... and (ii) correct any incorrect personal data ... (C) ... an opportunity to appeal such adverse consequential decision if such adverse consequential decision is based upon inaccurate personal data ... Such appeal shall, if technically feasible, allow for human review. (3) The deployer shall provide the notice, statements, information, description and instructions required under subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection: (A) Directly to the consumer; (B) In plain language; (C) In all languages in which such deployer, in the ordinary course of such deployer's business, provides contracts, disclaimers, sale announcements and other information to consumers; and (D) In a format that is accessible to consumers with disabilities.

(f) 14 Beginning on October 1, 2026, and except as provided in subsection (g) of this section, each deployer shall make available, in a manner that is clear and readily available on such deployer's Internet web site, a statement summarizing: (A) The types of high-risk artificial intelligence systems that are currently deployed by such deployer; (B) How such deployer manages any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination that may arise from deployment of each high-risk artificial intelligence system described in subparagraph (A) of this subdivision; and (C) In detail, the nature, source and extent of the information collected and used by such deployer. (2) Each deployer shall periodically update the statement made available pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection.

(h) 15 If a deployer deploys a high-risk artificial intelligence system on or after October 1, 2026, and subsequently discovers that the high-risk artificial intelligence system has caused algorithmic discrimination to at least one thousand consumers, the deployer shall send to the Attorney General, in a form and manner prescribed by the Attorney General, a notice disclosing such discovery. The deployer shall send such notice to the Attorney General without unreasonable delay but in no event later than ninety days after the date on which the deployer discovered such algorithmic discrimination.

(j) 16 Beginning on October 1, 2026, the Attorney General may require that a deployer, or a third party contracted by the deployer as set forth in subsection (c) of this section, as applicable, disclose to the Attorney General, as part of an investigation conducted by the Attorney General, not later than ninety days after a request by the Attorney General and in a form and manner prescribed by the Attorney General, the risk management policy implemented pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, impact assessment completed pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or records maintained pursuant to subdivision (5) of subsection (c) of this section.

Section 4 is the bill's most detailed obligation section. Deployers must exercise reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination (with a rebuttable presumption). Core requirements include: (1) implementing and maintaining an iterative risk management policy and program aligned with NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or equivalent frameworks; (2) completing impact assessments at deployment, annually, and within 90 days of an intentional and substantial modification; (3) conducting at least annual post-deployment reviews for discrimination; (4) notifying consumers before a consequential decision is made using a high-risk AI system and providing detailed adverse-decision explanations, data-access rights, and appeal opportunities with human review; (5) publicly disclosing deployed high-risk AI system types and data practices; (6) reporting to the AG within 90 days upon discovering discrimination affecting 1,000+ consumers; and (7) retaining impact assessments for at least three years after final deployment. A significant deployer carve-out exists where the developer contractually assumes the deployer's program and assessment duties and other conditions are met.

Compliance actions 8 items

Deployers of high-risk AI systems must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.

H-02.1

Deployers must implement and maintain an iterative risk management policy and program covering principles, processes, and personnel for identifying, documenting, and mitigating algorithmic discrimination risks, calibrated to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or an equivalent framework and to the deployer's size, system scope, and data sensitivity.

G-01.1

Deployers must complete an impact assessment of each high-risk AI system at deployment, at least annually thereafter, and within 90 days of an intentional and substantial modification, covering purpose, discrimination risk analysis, data categories, performance metrics, transparency measures, and post-deployment monitoring. Impact assessments and all associated records must be retained for at least three years after final deployment.

H-02.3

Deployers must review the deployment of each high-risk AI system at least annually to verify it is not causing algorithmic discrimination.

H-02.8

Deployers must, before making a consequential decision using a high-risk AI system, notify the consumer that AI is being used, disclose the system's purpose and the nature of the decision, offer opt-out rights, and provide contact information and a plain-language system description. If the decision is adverse, the deployer must disclose the principal reasons (including AI's contribution and the data types and sources used), provide an opportunity to examine and correct personal data, and offer an appeal with human review where technically feasible. All notices must be in plain language, multilingual, accessible, and delivered directly to the consumer.

H-01.1

Deployers must publish and periodically update on their website a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they deploy, how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, and the nature, source, and extent of data collected and used.

G-02.4

Deployers must notify the Attorney General within 90 days of discovering that a deployed high-risk AI system has caused algorithmic discrimination to at least 1,000 consumers.

R-01.3

Deployers must, upon AG request as part of an investigation, disclose their risk management policy, impact assessments, and related records within 90 days in a form and manner prescribed by the AG.

R-02.2

Section 5

General-purpose AI model developer obligations

Developer

(a)(1) 17 Beginning on October 1, 2026, each developer of a general-purpose artificial intelligence model shall, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section: (1) (A) Create and maintain technical documentation for the general-purpose artificial intelligence model, which technical documentation shall: (i) Include the training and testing processes for such general-purpose artificial intelligence model; (ii) Include at least the following information, as appropriate, considering the size and risk profile of such general-purpose artificial intelligence model: (I) The tasks such general-purpose artificial intelligence model is intended to perform; (II) The type and nature of artificial intelligence systems in which such general-purpose artificial intelligence model is intended to be integrated; (III) Acceptable use policies for such general-purpose artificial intelligence model; (IV) The date such general-purpose artificial intelligence model is released; (V) The methods by which such general-purpose artificial intelligence model is distributed; and (VI) The modality and format of inputs and outputs for such general-purpose artificial intelligence model; (iii) Include a description of the data that were used for purposes of training, testing and validation ... including ... (I) The type and provenance of such data; (II) Curation methodologies used for such data; (III) How such data were obtained and selected; (IV) All measures used to identify unsuitable data sources; and (V) Where applicable, methods used to detect identifiable biases; and (iv) Be reviewed and revised at least annually or more frequently as necessary to maintain the accuracy of such technical documentation; and (B) Establish, implement and maintain a policy to comply with federal and state copyright laws;

(a)(2) 18 Create, implement, maintain and make available to persons that intend to integrate such general-purpose artificial intelligence model into such persons' artificial intelligence systems documentation and information that: (A) Enables such persons to (i) understand the capabilities and limitations of such general-purpose artificial intelligence model, and (ii) comply with such persons' obligations under sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act; (B) Discloses, at a minimum, (i) the technical means required for such general-purpose artificial intelligence model to be integrated into such persons' artificial intelligence systems, (ii) the information listed in subparagraph (A)(ii) of subdivision (1) of this subsection, and (iii) the description required under subparagraph (A)(iii) of subdivision (1) of this subsection; and (C) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, is reviewed and revised at least annually or more frequently as necessary to maintain the accuracy of such documentation and information.

Section 5 addresses developers of general-purpose artificial intelligence models — models displaying significant generality and capable of performing a wide range of tasks. Developers must create and maintain technical documentation covering training/testing processes, intended tasks, system integration context, acceptable-use policies, release dates, distribution methods, input/output modalities, and detailed training data descriptions. They must also establish a copyright compliance policy and provide downstream integrators with documentation enabling them to understand model capabilities/limitations and comply with the act. Open-source models released under qualifying licenses are partially exempted from technical-documentation and annual-revision requirements if model parameters are publicly available, but developers relying on the internal-use exemption must still maintain an AI risk management framework.

Compliance actions 2 items

Developers of general-purpose AI models must create, maintain, and annually revise technical documentation covering training and testing processes, intended tasks, integration contexts, acceptable-use policies, release dates, distribution methods, input/output modalities, and detailed training data descriptions (type, provenance, curation methods, selection criteria, bias detection methods). Developers must also establish and maintain a copyright compliance policy.

G-01.1

Developers of general-purpose AI models must create, maintain, and make available to downstream integrators documentation enabling them to understand the model's capabilities and limitations and comply with the act, including technical integration requirements, training data descriptions, and model metadata.

T-03.3

Section 6

AI identity disclosure

Deployer

(a)–(b) 19 Beginning on October 1, 2026, and except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, each person doing business in this state, including, but not limited to, each deployer that deploys, offers, sells, leases, licenses, gives or otherwise makes available, as applicable, any artificial intelligence system that is intended to interact with consumers shall ensure that it is disclosed to each consumer who interacts with such artificial intelligence system that such consumer is interacting with an artificial intelligence system. (b) No disclosure shall be required under subsection (a) of this section under circumstances in which a reasonable person would deem it obvious that such person is interacting with an artificial intelligence system.

Section 6 imposes a broad AI identity disclosure requirement on any person doing business in Connecticut — including deployers — that offers an AI system intended to interact with consumers. The disclosure must inform each consumer that they are interacting with an AI system. An exception applies where a reasonable person would deem it obvious that they are interacting with AI.

Compliance actions 1 item

Any person doing business in Connecticut that offers a consumer-facing AI system must disclose to each interacting consumer that they are interacting with an AI system, unless a reasonable person would deem the AI nature obvious.

T-01.1

Section 7

Synthetic digital content labeling

Developer

(a)–(c) 20 Beginning on October 1, 2026, and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the developer of an artificial intelligence system, including, but not limited to, a general-purpose artificial intelligence model, that generates or manipulates synthetic digital content shall: (1) Ensure that the outputs of such artificial intelligence system are marked and detectable as synthetic digital content, and that such outputs are so marked and detectable (A) not later than the time that consumers who did not create such outputs first interact with, or are exposed to, such outputs, and (B) in a manner that (i) is detectable by consumers, and (ii) complies with any applicable accessibility requirements; and (2) As far as technically feasible and in a manner that is consistent with any nationally or internationally recognized technical standards, ensure that such developer's technical solutions are effective, interoperable, robust and reliable, considering (A) the specificities and limitations of different types of synthetic digital content, (B) the implementation costs, and (C) the generally acknowledged state of the art. (b) If the synthetic digital content described in subsection (a) of this section is in an audio, image or video format, and such synthetic digital content forms part of an evidently artistic, creative, satirical, fictional analogous work or program, the disclosure required under said subsection shall be limited to a disclosure that does not hinder the display or enjoyment of such work or program. (c) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not apply: (1) To any synthetic digital content that (A) consists exclusively of text, (B) is published to inform the public on any matter of public interest, or (C) is unlikely to mislead a reasonable person consuming such synthetic digital content; or (2) To the extent that any artificial intelligence system described in subsection (a) of this section (A) performs an assistive function for standard editing, (B) does not substantially alter the input data provided by the developer or the semantics thereof, or (C) is used to detect, prevent, investigate or prosecute any crime where authorized by law.

Section 7 requires developers of AI systems that generate or manipulate synthetic digital content to ensure outputs are marked and detectable as synthetic by the time consumers first encounter them. The marking must be consumer-perceptible, accessibility-compliant, and use interoperable, robust technical solutions consistent with recognized standards. Carve-outs apply for text-only content, content published in the public interest, content unlikely to mislead, evidently artistic or satirical works (limited disclosure), assistive editing functions, and law-enforcement uses.

Compliance actions 1 item

Developers of AI systems that generate or manipulate synthetic digital content must ensure outputs are marked and detectable as synthetic by the time consumers first encounter them, using consumer-perceptible, accessibility-compliant, interoperable, robust, and reliable technical solutions consistent with recognized standards. Text-only content, public-interest content, content unlikely to mislead, evidently artistic works, assistive editing, and law-enforcement uses are exempt or subject to limited disclosure.

T-02.1

Section 8

Exemptions and savings clauses

(a)–(h) Nothing in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act shall be construed to restrict a developer's, integrator's, deployer's or other person's ability to: (1) Comply with federal, state or municipal law; (2) Comply with a civil, criminal or regulatory inquiry, investigation, subpoena or summons by a federal, state, municipal or other governmental authority; (3) Cooperate with a law enforcement agency ... (4) Investigate, establish, exercise, prepare for or defend a legal claim; (5) Take immediate steps to protect an interest that is essential for the life or physical safety of a consumer or another individual; (6) (A) By any means other than facial recognition technology, prevent, detect, protect against or respond to (i) a security incident ... (7) Engage in public or peer-reviewed scientific or statistical research in the public interest ... (8) Conduct research, testing, development and integration activities regarding an artificial intelligence system or model ... (9) Effectuate a product recall; (10) Identify and repair technical errors ... (11) Assist another developer, integrator, deployer or person with any of the obligations imposed under sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act. (b) The obligations imposed on developers, integrators, deployers or other persons under sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act shall not apply where compliance by the developer, integrator, deployer or other person with said sections would violate an evidentiary privilege under the laws of this state. (c) Nothing in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act shall be construed to impose any obligation on a developer, integrator, deployer or other person that adversely affects the rights or freedoms of any person, including, but not limited to, the rights of any person (1) to freedom of speech or freedom of the press guaranteed in (A) the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and (B) section 5 of article first of the Constitution of the state, or (2) under section 52-146t of the general statutes. (d) Nothing in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act shall be construed to apply to any developer, integrator, deployer or other person: (1) Insofar as such developer, integrator, deployer or other person develops, integrates, deploys, puts into service or intentionally and substantially modifies, as applicable, a high-risk artificial intelligence system (A) that has been approved, authorized, certified, cleared, developed, integrated or granted by (i) a federal agency ... or (ii) a regulated entity subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or (B) in compliance with standards that are (i) established by (I) any federal agency ... and (ii) substantially equivalent to, and at least as stringent as, the standards established in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act; ... (f) Any insurer ... fraternal benefit society ... or health carrier ... shall be deemed to be in full compliance with the provisions of sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act if such insurer, fraternal benefit society or health carrier has implemented and maintains a written artificial intelligence systems program in accordance with all requirements established by the Insurance Commissioner. (g) (1) Any bank, out-of-state bank, Connecticut credit union, federal credit union or out-of-state credit union, or any affiliate or subsidiary thereof, shall be deemed to be in full compliance with the provisions of sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act if such bank ... is subject to examination by any state or federal prudential regulator under any published guidance or regulations that apply to the use of high-risk artificial intelligence systems and such guidance or regulations (A) impose requirements that are substantially equivalent to, and at least as stringent as, the requirements set forth in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act ... (h) If a developer, integrator, deployer or other person engages in any action pursuant to an exemption set forth in subsections (a) to (g), inclusive, of this section, the developer, integrator, deployer or other person bears the burden of demonstrating that such action qualifies for such exemption.

Section 8 enumerates a broad set of exemptions and savings clauses applicable to the entire act (sections 1–10). These include exemptions for law-enforcement cooperation, legal claims, security incidents, scientific research, pre-market R&D, product recalls, technical error repair, FDA/FAA-approved systems, federal defense/commerce/NASA contracts (except for employment and housing AI), HIPAA-covered entities providing non-high-risk health care recommendations, regulatory sandbox participants, insurers complying with Insurance Commissioner requirements, banks subject to equivalent prudential regulator guidance, and activities protected by the First Amendment or state evidentiary privileges. The section also preserves existing rights, claims, and remedies at law or equity, and clarifies that the act's presumptions and defenses apply only to AG enforcement actions.

Section 9

AG small business education program

Not later than January 1, 2026, the Attorney General shall, within available appropriations, develop and implement a comprehensive public education, outreach and assistance program for developers, integrators and deployers that are small businesses, as defined in section 4-168a of the general statutes. Such program shall, at a minimum, disseminate educational materials concerning (1) the requirements established in sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act, including, but not limited to, the duties of developers, integrators and deployers under sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act, (2) the impact assessments required under subsection (c) of section 4 of this act, (3) the Attorney General's powers under sections 1 to 10, inclusive, of this act, and (4) any other matters the Attorney General, in the Attorney General's discretion, deems relevant for the purposes of such program.

Section 9 directs the Attorney General to develop and implement, by January 1, 2026, a comprehensive public education, outreach, and assistance program for small-business developers, integrators, and deployers covering the act's requirements, impact assessments, AG enforcement powers, and related matters.

Section 10

Enforcement

(a)–(f) The Attorney General shall have exclusive authority to enforce the provisions of sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act. (b) Except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, during the period beginning on October 1, 2026, and ending on September 30, 2027, the Attorney General shall, prior to initiating any action for a violation of any provision of sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act, issue a notice of violation to the developer, integrator, deployer or other person if the Attorney General determines that it is possible to cure such violation. If the developer, integrator, deployer or other person fails to cure such violation not later than sixty days after receipt of the notice of violation, the Attorney General may bring an action pursuant to this section. (c) Except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, beginning on October 1, 2027, the Attorney General may, in determining whether to grant a developer, integrator, deployer or other person the opportunity to cure a violation described in subsection (b) of this section, consider: (1) The number of violations; (2) the size and complexity of the developer, integrator, deployer or other person; (3) the nature and extent of the developer's, integrator's, deployer's or other person's business; (4) the substantial likelihood of injury to the public; (5) the safety of persons or property; and (6) whether such violation was likely caused by human or technical error. (d) Nothing in sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act shall be construed as providing the basis for a private right of action for violations of said sections. (e) Except as provided in subsections (a) to (d), inclusive, of this section and subsection (f) of this section, a violation of the requirements established in sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act shall constitute an unfair trade practice for purposes of section 42-110b of the general statutes and shall be enforced solely by the Attorney General. The provisions of section 42-110g of the general statutes shall not apply to any such violation. (f) (1) In any action commenced by the Attorney General for any violation of sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act, it shall be an affirmative defense that the developer, integrator, deployer or other person: (A) Discovers a violation of any provision of sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act through red-teaming; (B) Not later than sixty days after discovering the violation as set forth in subparagraph (A) of this subdivision: (i) Cures such violation; and (ii) provides to the Attorney General, in a form and manner prescribed by the Attorney General, notice that such violation has been cured and evidence that any harm caused by such violation has been mitigated; and (C) Is otherwise in compliance with the latest version of: (i) The "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework" published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology; (ii) ISO or IEC 42001 of the International Organization for Standardization; (iii) a nationally or internationally recognized risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems ... or (iv) any risk management framework for artificial intelligence systems that is substantially equivalent to, and at least as stringent as, the risk management frameworks described in subparagraphs (C)(i) to (C)(iii), inclusive, of this subdivision. (3) Nothing in this section or sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act, including, but not limited to, the enforcement authority granted to the Attorney General under this section, shall be construed to preempt or otherwise affect any right, claim, remedy, presumption or defense available at law or in equity. Any rebuttable presumption or affirmative defense established under this section or sections 1 to 9, inclusive, of this act shall apply only to an enforcement action brought by the Attorney General pursuant to this section and shall not apply to any right, claim, remedy, presumption or defense available at law or in equity.

Section 10 vests exclusive enforcement authority in the Attorney General and expressly excludes any private right of action. During the first year of operative effect (October 1, 2026 – September 30, 2027), the AG must issue a notice of violation and allow 60 days to cure before initiating an action when cure is possible. After September 30, 2027, the cure opportunity is discretionary. An affirmative defense is available for entities that discover a violation through red-teaming, cure it within 60 days while notifying the AG, and are otherwise compliant with NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or an equivalent framework. Violations constitute unfair trade practices under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110b enforceable solely by the AG; the private enforcement provisions of § 42-110g are expressly excluded. The section preserves all existing common-law rights, claims, remedies, presumptions, and defenses.

Section 25

State agency AI inventory and assessment

Government

(b)–(d) 21 Not later than December 31, 2023, and annually thereafter, the Commissioner of Administrative Services shall conduct an inventory of all systems that employ artificial intelligence and are in use by any state agency. Each such inventory shall include at least the following information for each such system: (A) The name of such system and the vendor, if any, that provided such system; (B) A description of the general capabilities and uses of such system; (C) Whether such system was used to independently make, inform or materially support a conclusion, decision or judgment; and (D) Whether such system underwent an impact assessment prior to implementation. (2) The Commissioner of Administrative Services shall make each inventory conducted pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection publicly available on the state's open data portal. (c) Beginning on February 1, 2024, the Commissioner of Administrative Services shall perform ongoing assessments of systems that employ artificial intelligence and are in use by state agencies to ensure that no such system shall result in any unlawful discrimination or disparate impact described in subparagraph (B) of subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of section 4-68jj. (d) The Commissioner of Administrative Services shall, in consultation with other state agencies, collective bargaining units that represent state agency employees and industry experts, develop trainings for state agency employees on (1) the use of generative artificial intelligence tools that are determined by the commissioner, pursuant to the assessment performed under subsection (c) of this section, to achieve equitable outcomes, and (2) methods for identifying and mitigating potential output inaccuracies, fabricated text, hallucinations and biases of generative artificial intelligence while respecting the privacy of the public and complying with all applicable state laws and policies. Beginning on July 1, 2026, the commissioner shall make such trainings available to state agency employees not less frequently than annually.

Section 25 amends the existing state AI inventory statute (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4a-2e) to update the AI definition to align with section 1, add a generative-AI definition, require the Commissioner of Administrative Services (rather than the Department) to conduct the annual inventory, publish it on the state open data portal, perform ongoing anti-discrimination assessments, and — new in this bill — develop and offer annual employee trainings on generative AI use, output-accuracy identification, hallucination mitigation, and bias awareness.

Compliance actions 1 item

The Commissioner of Administrative Services must annually inventory all AI systems used by state agencies (including vendor, capabilities, decision-making role, and impact-assessment status), publish the inventory on the state open data portal, perform ongoing discrimination assessments, and beginning July 1, 2026, provide annual employee trainings on generative AI use and bias mitigation.

PS-01.1

Section 27

Unlawful dissemination of intimate images — synthetic images

Publisher

(a)–(e) 22 A person is guilty of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image when (1) such person intentionally disseminates by electronic or other means a photograph, film, videotape or other recorded image or synthetic image of (A) the genitals, pubic area or buttocks of another person with less than a fully opaque covering of such body part, or the breast of such other person who is female with less than a fully opaque covering of any portion of such breast below the top of the nipple, or (B) another person engaged in sexual intercourse, as defined in section 53a-193, (2) such person disseminates such image knowing that such other person did not consent to such dissemination, and (3) such other person suffers harm as a result of such dissemination. (b) For purposes of this section: (1) "Disseminate" means to sell, give, provide, lend, trade, mail, deliver, transfer, publish, distribute, circulate, present, exhibit, advertise or otherwise offer; (2) "Harm" includes, but is not limited to, subjecting such other person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, physical injury, financial injury, psychological harm or serious emotional distress; and (3) "Synthetic image" means any photograph, film, videotape or other image that (A) is not wholly recorded by a camera, (B) is either partially or wholly generated by a computer system, and (C) depicts, and is virtually indistinguishable from an actual representation of, an identifiable person.

Section 27 amends Connecticut's existing criminal intimate-image dissemination statute (§ 53a-189c) to extend coverage to synthetic images — images not wholly recorded by a camera, partially or wholly generated by a computer system, that depict and are virtually indistinguishable from an actual representation of an identifiable person. The amendment also changes the consent element from knowledge that the image would not be disseminated to knowledge that the person did not consent to dissemination. Existing penalties apply: class A misdemeanor for dissemination to one person, class D felony for dissemination to more than one person via an interactive computer service.

Compliance actions 1 item

No person may intentionally disseminate a synthetic intimate image — an image partially or wholly generated by a computer system that is virtually indistinguishable from an actual representation of an identifiable person — depicting intimate body parts or sexual intercourse, knowing the depicted person did not consent, where harm results. Violation is a class A misdemeanor (single recipient) or class D felony (multiple recipients via electronic service).

CP-02.1

Public Sector Procurement restrictions · government use

1 item

PS-01.1

Transparency AI identity disclosure · periodic reminders

3 items

T-03.3

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers of general-purpose AI models must create, maintain, and make available to downstream integrators documentation enabling them to understand the model's capabilities and limitations and comply with the act, including technical integration requirements, training data descriptions, and model metadata.

T-01.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Any person doing business in Connecticut that offers a consumer-facing AI system must disclose to each interacting consumer that they are interacting with an AI system, unless a reasonable person would deem the AI nature obvious.

T-02.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers of AI systems that generate or manipulate synthetic digital content must ensure outputs are marked and detectable as synthetic by the time consumers first encounter them, using consumer-perceptible, accessibility-compliant, interoperable, robust, and reliable technical solutions consistent with recognized standards. Text-only content, public-interest content, content unlikely to mislead, evidently artistic works, assistive editing, and law-enforcement uses are exempt or subject to limited disclosure.

Deceptive Conduct AI-generated likeness · consent requirements

1 item

CP-02.1

Human Oversight Decision review · appeal pathways

7 items

H-02.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers of high-risk AI systems must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from intended and contracted uses of the system.

H-02.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Integrators must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination arising from the intended and contracted uses of any high-risk AI system they integrate into a product or service.

H-02

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Integrators must enter into a binding contract with the developer of each high-risk AI system they integrate, clearly allocating the developer's documentation and impact-assessment duties between the developer and integrator.

H-02.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers of high-risk AI systems must use reasonable care to protect consumers from known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination.

H-02.3

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must complete an impact assessment of each high-risk AI system at deployment, at least annually thereafter, and within 90 days of an intentional and substantial modification, covering purpose, discrimination risk analysis, data categories, performance metrics, transparency measures, and post-deployment monitoring. Impact assessments and all associated records must be retained for at least three years after final deployment.

H-02.8

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must review the deployment of each high-risk AI system at least annually to verify it is not causing algorithmic discrimination.

H-01.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must, before making a consequential decision using a high-risk AI system, notify the consumer that AI is being used, disclose the system's purpose and the nature of the decision, offer opt-out rights, and provide contact information and a plain-language system description. If the decision is adverse, the deployer must disclose the principal reasons (including AI's contribution and the data types and sources used), provide an opportunity to examine and correct personal data, and offer an appeal with human review where technically feasible. All notices must be in plain language, multilingual, accessible, and delivered directly to the consumer.

Governance Risk management · accountability programs

6 items

G-02.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers must make available to each deployer documentation covering foreseeable uses, training data summaries, discrimination risks, performance evaluation methods, data governance measures, intended outputs, mitigation measures, and monitoring guidance for each high-risk AI system, including materials necessary for the deployer to complete an impact assessment.

G-02.4

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers must publish and maintain on their website or in a public use-case inventory a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they offer and how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, updated within 90 days of any intentional and substantial modification.

G-02.4

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Integrators must publish and maintain on their website or in a public use-case inventory a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they have integrated and how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, updated within 90 days of any intentional and substantial modification.

G-01.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must implement and maintain an iterative risk management policy and program covering principles, processes, and personnel for identifying, documenting, and mitigating algorithmic discrimination risks, calibrated to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or an equivalent framework and to the deployer's size, system scope, and data sensitivity.

G-02.4

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must publish and periodically update on their website a statement summarizing the types of high-risk AI systems they deploy, how they manage algorithmic discrimination risks, and the nature, source, and extent of data collected and used.

G-01.1

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers of general-purpose AI models must create, maintain, and annually revise technical documentation covering training and testing processes, intended tasks, integration contexts, acceptable-use policies, release dates, distribution methods, input/output modalities, and detailed training data descriptions (type, provenance, curation methods, selection criteria, bias detection methods). Developers must also establish and maintain a copyright compliance policy.

Regulatory Reporting · disclosure · audit

4 items

R-01.3

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers must disclose to the Attorney General and all known deployers any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination within 90 days of discovering (through testing or a credible deployer report) that the system has caused or is reasonably likely to have caused algorithmic discrimination to at least 1,000 consumers.

R-02.2

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Developers must, upon request by the Attorney General as part of an investigation, disclose the documentation described in section 2(b) in a form and manner the AG prescribes. Developers may designate trade-secret or security-sensitive information as exempt from public disclosure.

R-01.3

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must notify the Attorney General within 90 days of discovering that a deployed high-risk AI system has caused algorithmic discrimination to at least 1,000 consumers.

R-02.2

Beginning Oct 1, 2026 Deployers must, upon AG request as part of an investigation, disclose their risk management policy, impact assessments, and related records within 90 days in a form and manner prescribed by the AG.

Passage Likelihood

Failed

Status Failed

Final action House Calendar Number 599

Legislative History

2025-01-08 Referred to Joint Committee on General Law

2025-01-22 Vote to Draft

2025-02-19 Drafted by Committee

2025-02-20 Referred to Joint Committee on General Law

2025-02-21 Public Hearing 02/26

2025-03-21 Joint Favorable Substitute

2025-03-24 Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-04-03 Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/08/25 5:00 PM

2025-04-09 Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-04-09 Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate

2025-04-09 Senate Calendar Number 328

2025-04-09 File Number 603

2025-05-01 Referred by Senate to Committee on Judiciary

2025-05-06 Joint Favorable

2025-05-06 Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-05-07 Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-05-07 No New File by Committee on Judiciary

2025-05-07 Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate

2025-05-08 Referred by Senate to Committee on Appropriations

2025-05-08 Immediate Transmittal

2025-05-12 Joint Favorable

2025-05-13 Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-05-13 Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office

2025-05-13 No New File by Committee on Appropriations

2025-05-13 Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate

2025-05-14 Senate Adopted Senate Amendment Schedule A 8540

2025-05-14 Senate Adopted Senate Amendment Schedule B 8554

2025-05-14 Senate Passed as Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule A,B

2025-05-16 Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House

2025-05-16 House Calendar Number 599

Sources

Full Text ↗

Entry Last Reviewed

2026-05-20

AI generated